To
Whom It May Concern: I have been asked to write a letter addressing the
issue of dental amalgam mercury fillings. I truly have a unique perspective
based both in real science and anecdotal evidence because I am a dentist who
has performed a high level of international based research about the amalgam
mercury fillings and I am a biologic dentist who removes amalgams from
patients who visit my office from around the country. These patients want
their amalgams removed to eliminate the source of mercury in various organs
and tissues. I also am able to evaluate these patients in a more controlled
environment with tests before and after amalgam removal as well as
accumulated subjective date on these patients (e.g. symptoms survey). The mounting evidence about the toxicity of
mercury amalgams comes from within the Although there exists a number
of sources of mercury (fish, vaccinations, several body products e.g. contact
lens solution) the CDC in As a dentist who removes amalgams in a controlled
environment from people who are monitored before, during and afterward for
several health parameters and symptoms I have a unique perspective of the
damage caused by mercury amalgams while in the mouth. I see people every week
who not only report dramatic improvement of many symptoms but obvious
improvement in health parameters as seen in several tests. Combine that
perspective with the health changes people experience as they specifically
detoxify heavy metal and mercury as seen on urinary excretion tests and it
leaves little to the imagination that mercury is an incredible health
challenge. Compare this with the arguments used by the
organizations and groups advocating continued used of amalgam which are that
amalgam has been used for 175 years with no obvious health problems (no
research is done to demonstrate that it is safe) and it is clear to see that
these groups are motivated by issues such as money, legal repercussions and
momentum rather than pure science and the health of our citizens. It becomes
even more of a problem when threats are made against dentists who attempt to
bring this information to the public. When it is clinically obvious that mercury is
directly or indirectly involved in many of the chronic illnesses which
trouble humans, infants to geriatrics, when many countries and organizations
are banning or condemning the continued use of mercury or condemning the
continued use of mercury filled amalgams and when the greatest source of
mercury in our bodies is from these amalgams it is unjustifiable to allow
continued suppression of this information so people can freely choose the use
of amalgams or the alternatives in their mouths or the mouths of their
families. I will continue to be a strong
advocate of mercury detoxification because of what I see are the
immense benefits to mankind every day. Unfortunately, I must be vigilant that
I don’t have my license taken away. Consequently, I am submitting this letter anonymously. I hope you will begin legislative action
that really helps the citizens of Sincerely, A very concerned dentist |